Drawing for OVERLORD

USPTO serial 76271875

OVERLORD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2738151Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 15, 2003
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OVERLORD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSHUA M. GERBEN,

JOSHUA M GERBEN, Gerben Law Firm, PLLC1050 Connecticut Ave NWSuite 500Washington, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair shampoo, hair conditioner, facial cleaners, skin cleansing lotion, skin soap, laundry detergent, facial lotion, body lotion, lipstick, facial masks, nail enamel, perfume, hair mousse, and toothpasteSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDDec 16, 1989

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2009C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jul 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 11, 2009C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jun 11, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 15, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 5, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Mar 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 22, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 2, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 2, 2002EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 13, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 21, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance