USPTO serial 76271887
THE RELIABILITY YOU DESERVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE RELIABILITY YOU DESERVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HOSPITAL FOOD SERVICES-ONTARIO, INC.
Ottawa, Ontario K1B 3V6, CA
Other trademarks owned by HOSPITAL FOOD SERVICES-ONTARIO, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles P. LaPolla
CHARLES P LAPOLLA OSTROLENK FABER GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICAS FL 7NEW YORK, NY 10036-8443UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Frozen entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; frozen breakfast cereals; frozen omelette and scrambled eggs; frozen soups; frozen broth and pot roast juice; frozen fruit-based spreads; frozen prepared puree of fruits, namely, peach, pear, pineapple, prune and fruit cocktail | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Frozen entrees consisting primarily of pastas or rice; frozen quiche; frozen grilled cheese sandwiches; frozen oatmeal and cream of wheat; frozen pies; frozen dumplings; frozen toast and pancakes; frozen rolls; frozen cookies and tea biscuits; frozen muffins; frozen dessert squares; frozen cobblers and crisps; frozen cakes and fruit loaves; frozen puddings and mousses; sauces; gravy; poultry stuffing containing bread; chili | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Food distribution | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Catering services; food preparation; food nutrition and preparation consultation; food sanitation consultation; contract food services consultation in the field of food service equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HOSPITAL FOOD SERVICES-ONTARIO, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THE RELIABILITY YOU DESERVE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |