USPTO serial 76272003
TOPICAL DISCUSSION OF DEVELOPMENTS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 16, 2002
- Examiner
- MOLINOFF, JEFFREY S.
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TOPICAL DISCUSSION OF DEVELOPMENTS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A Catalina Jr
RICHARD A CATALINA JR CATALINA & ASSOCIATES LLC1350 CAMPUS PKWY STE 200NEPTUNE, NJ 07753UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Catalina, Richard A., Jr.
- Other trademarks owned by Catalina, Richard A., Jr.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TOPICAL DISCUSSION OF DEVELOPMENTS IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 23, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |