Drawing for BODY BALANCE LES MILLS BODY TRAINING SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 76272054

BODY BALANCE LES MILLS BODY TRAINING SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BODY BALANCE LES MILLS BODY TRAINING SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marnie Wright Barnhorst

MARNIE WRIGHT BARNHORST ESQ THE TRADEMARK GROUP, APLC7850 IVANHOE AVELA JOLLA, CA 92037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041recreation services, namely, fitness training services; educational services; namely conducting workshops and seminars in the field of physical fitness and music; gymnasium services; health club services; sport club services; fitness club services; exercise instruction; providing facilities for sports tournaments; rental of sports and exercise equipment; providing information in the field of sportsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 9, 2005ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 8, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 4, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 15, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 4, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 15, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 2, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 15, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 25, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 20, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 10, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 14, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance