USPTO serial 76272121
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
SAN FRANCISCO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Steiner
MARK A STEINER TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Developing and implementing promotional campaigns for food and beverage products, health and beauty products, non-prescription medications, photographic products, household products, and the hotel and travel industries, and disseminating advertising matter in conjunction therewith | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |