Drawing for JELLY BELLY

USPTO serial 76272155

JELLY BELLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JELLY BELLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES R CYPHER

JAMES R CYPHER THE LAW OFFICES OF JAMES R. CYPHER1607 FINANCIAL CTR BLDG405 14TH STOAKLAND, CA 94612-2704

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005jelly bean candy containing nutritional supplements including vitamins, minerals, and herbsACTIVE—
030high energy sports jelly bean candyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 24, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 25, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 19, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance