USPTO serial 76272163
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lugenia Richardson
LUGENIA RICHARDSON TRADEMARKS DIRECTORMASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL2000 PURCHASE STPURCHASE, NY 10577-2405| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software for use in electronic business transactions in the nature of facilitating micro-payments, namely, payments ranging from a few cents to several dollars, to internet retailers, merchants and content providers; computer software to perform electronic wallet functions, namely, for storage of value in a centralized database to facilitate e-commerce; computer hardware in the nature of electronic encryption units; computer security software, namely, software for use in verifying digital signature and digital certificate, software for secure data storage and retrieval and transmission of confidential customer information used by individuals, banking and financial institutions; magnetic encoded cards and smart cards containing an integrated circuit chip cards for electronic business transactions; blank integrated circuit cards in the nature of bank cards, credit cards, debit cards and payment cards; magnetic encoded card readers for magnetically encoded cards and cards containing an integrated circuit chip; computer software designed to enable magnetically coded cards to interact with terminals and readers in the financial services industry; telecommunications equipment and point of sale transaction terminals; computer software for transmitting, displaying and storing transaction, identification, and financial information for use in the financial services, banking and telecommunications industries; telecommunications equipment, namely, transponders; and electronic verification apparatus, namely, electronic verification readers for verifying authentication of charge cards, bank cards, credit cards, debit cards and payment cards | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 4, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |