Drawing for MASTERING E-BUSINESS

USPTO serial 76272163

MASTERING E-BUSINESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEJESUS, YSA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASTERING E-BUSINESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lugenia Richardson

LUGENIA RICHARDSON TRADEMARKS DIRECTORMASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL2000 PURCHASE STPURCHASE, NY 10577-2405

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software for use in electronic business transactions in the nature of facilitating micro-payments, namely, payments ranging from a few cents to several dollars, to internet retailers, merchants and content providers; computer software to perform electronic wallet functions, namely, for storage of value in a centralized database to facilitate e-commerce; computer hardware in the nature of electronic encryption units; computer security software, namely, software for use in verifying digital signature and digital certificate, software for secure data storage and retrieval and transmission of confidential customer information used by individuals, banking and financial institutions; magnetic encoded cards and smart cards containing an integrated circuit chip cards for electronic business transactions; blank integrated circuit cards in the nature of bank cards, credit cards, debit cards and payment cards; magnetic encoded card readers for magnetically encoded cards and cards containing an integrated circuit chip; computer software designed to enable magnetically coded cards to interact with terminals and readers in the financial services industry; telecommunications equipment and point of sale transaction terminals; computer software for transmitting, displaying and storing transaction, identification, and financial information for use in the financial services, banking and telecommunications industries; telecommunications equipment, namely, transponders; and electronic verification apparatus, namely, electronic verification readers for verifying authentication of charge cards, bank cards, credit cards, debit cards and payment cardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 30, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 28, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 4, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Jul 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance