USPTO serial 76272293
BYBLOS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BYBLOS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michele J. Young, Esq.
MICHELE J. YOUNG SALTER & MICHAELSON321 S MAIN STREETPROVIDENCE, RI 02903-7108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Mediterranean style prepared foods and baked goods; namely, stuffed grape leaves; three bean salad; carrot and hijiki salad; tofu spread; hommus; baba ghannouj; tabouli; moussakaa, and prepared vegetable spreads made of hommus, baba ghannouj, tabouli, bulgur, moujedra, and moussakaa | ABANDONED | May 1, 1990 |
| 030 | Moujedra; vegetable salsa; bulgur; pita chips; and baklavah | ABANDONED | May 1, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |