USPTO serial 76272326
WEBSMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEBSMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Steiner
MARK A STEINER TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MAGNETICALLY ENCODED FINANCIAL CARDS, NAMELY DEBIT CARDS, PRIVATE LABEL CARDS, LOYALTY CARDS, TELEPHONE CALLING CARDS AND PRE-PAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARDS; EMBEDDED CHIP FINANCIAL CARDS, NAMELY DEBIT CARDS, CREDIT CARDS, PRIVATE LABEL CARDS, LOYALTY CARDS, TELEPHONE CALLING CARDS AND PRE-PAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARDS; MAGNETICALLY ENCODED CARD READERS; EMBEDDED CHIP CARD READERS; AND ELECTRONIC TERMINALS FOR POINT OF PURCHASE FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS, NAMELY, DEBIT CARD READER TERMINALS, PRIVATE LABEL CARD READER TERMINALS, LOYALTY CARD READER TERMINALS, TELEPHONE CALLING CARD READER TERMINALS AND PRE-PAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARD READER TERMINALS | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | POINT OF PURCHASE DISPLAYS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF RETAIL SALES; AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES; AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF TRAVEL SERVICES; AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF FINANCIAL SERVICES; AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF MARKETING; AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF TRANSPORTATION; AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION; DRIVER'S LICENSE AUTHENTICATION; CREDIT CARD VERIFICATION; ; DEBIT CARD VERIFICATION; AUTHENTICATION FOR FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS; TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF RETAIL SALES; AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES; AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF TRAVEL SERVICES; AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF FINANCIAL SERVICES; AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF MARKETING; AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF TRANSPORTATION; AUTHENTICATION AND VALIDATION IN THE FIELD OF PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION; DRIVER'S LICENSE AUTHENTICATION; CREDIT CARD VERIFICATION; DEBIT CARD VERIFICATION; AUTHENTICATION FOR FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 22, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |