USPTO serial 76272639
BB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Alexandria, VA
Alexandria, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GENE W. STOCKMAN
PAUL GRANDINETTI LEVY & GRANDINETTI1725 K ST NW STE 1108WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1423UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | TOTE BAGS AND PURSES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 7, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |