Drawing for THE DAWNING OF A NEW GRANGE GRANGE INSURANCE GROUP

USPTO serial 76272754

THE DAWNING OF A NEW GRANGE GRANGE INSURANCE GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE DAWNING OF A NEW GRANGE GRANGE INSURANCE GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Faye L. Tomlinson

FAYE L TOMLINSON CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1420 5TH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Property and casualty insurance underwriting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 31, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 25, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 25, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 25, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 25, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 20, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 6, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 2, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Feb 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance