USPTO serial 76272869
MR. RICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHHINA, KARANENDRA S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MR. RICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Brampton, Ontario, CA
Brampton, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI
CHRISTOPHER H KOZLOWSKI KOZLOWSKI & COMPANY5065 FOREST HILL DRMISSISSAUGA, ON L5N 5A7CANADAGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |