USPTO serial 76273090
CONVERGE KNOWLEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONVERGE KNOWLEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason E. Garcia
JASON E GARCIA PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLPP O BOX 7880SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120-7880UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Providing an online newsletter with commodity-specific information, market trends and analysis in the electronic and technology industries | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2001 |
| 035 | Providing data, information and analysis services online for the high technology industry, namely, product pricing, market pricing and valuations over several quarters for computer and electronic products relating to CPUs, chipsets, capacitors, DRAM, storage, peripherals and networking; Providing an online interactive marketplace and virtual community of companies and experts with deep industry and niche-market expertise in the field of technology; Providing a liquidity index for electronic components and computer products | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |