USPTO serial 76273126
DYNASTY MARBLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYNASTY MARBLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary F. Wang
Gary F. Wang, Esq. Law Offices of Gary F. Wang215 North Marengo Avenue, Suite 352Pasadena, CA 91101-1503UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | NON-METALLIC BUILDING MATERIALS, NAMELY, MANTELS FOR FIREPLACES, FIREPLACE BRICKS, FIREPLACE SURROUNDS, STONE MANTELS FOR FIREPLACES, MARBLE MANTELS FOR FIREPLACES AND INSTALLATION KITS FOR MARBLE MANTELS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF BRACKETS, NUTS AND BOLTS AND SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH, HEARTHS AND FACING KITS COMPRISED OF CERAMIC OR MARBLE TILES USED TO COVER THE FRONT FACE OF A FIREPLACE, BELOW THE MANTEL AND AROUND THE FIREPLACE OPENING, FIREPLACE DECORATIVE TRIM IN NATURAL AND SIMULATED MARBLES AND STONES | ACTIVE | Mar 20, 2000 |
| 035 | WHOLESALE AND RETAIL SERVICES FEATURING MANTELS FOR FIREPLACES | ACTIVE | Mar 20, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |