Drawing for WEATHERVISION

USPTO serial 76273134

WEATHERVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEATHERVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. Whitaker Rayner

W WHITAKER RAYNER WATKINS LUDLAM WINTER & STENNIS PA633 N STATE STJACKSON, MS 39202-3306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Audio and video broadcasting of customized, localized weather forecastsACTIVEJun 1, 2000
042weather forecasting, namely, providing customized audio and video local weather forecasting information via multi-media meansACTIVEJun 1, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 10, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 10, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 23, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 23, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 20, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 25, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 26, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance