Drawing for BE PHONE

USPTO serial 76273307

BE PHONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BE PHONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EMILIA F CANNELLA

EMILIA F CANNELLA BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP150 FEDERAL STBOSTON, MA 02110-1726UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICE, NAMELY, MOBILE TELEPHONES, COMBINING MOBILE VOICE AND INTERACTIVE TWO-WAY, INSTANT MESSAGING, ELECTRONIC MAIL, THE TRANSMISSION OF AUDIO AND/OR VIDEO FILESACTIVE—
035ADVERTISING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF WIRELESS COUPONS; DIRECT MARKETING AND ADVERTISING FOR OTHERSACTIVE—
038ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICESACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ONLINE COMPUTER GAMES; ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING SERVICES, NAMELY, THE PUBLICATION OF TEXT AND GRAPHIC WORKS BY OTHERS ONLINE FEATURING ADVERTISING AND PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS, NEWS AND CURRENT EVENTS, AND CITY GUIDESACTIVE—
042DESKTOP PUBLISHING SERVICESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 22, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 6, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 26, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 26, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 20, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance