USPTO serial 76273319
MACHO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRICE, WANDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MACHO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa K. DaCosta
LISA K DACOSTA ROBERTS & HUNDERTMARK, LLP35 WISCONSIN CIR STE 350CHEVY CHASE, MD 20815-7010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Mexican Style Food Products, namely, chimichangas; tacos; breakfast tacos; burritos; breakfast burritos; enchiladas; tostados; tortillas; corn tortillas; flour tortillas; tamales; taquitos; taco boats in the nature of taco shells in the shape of a boat/bowl; flautas; gorditas in the nature of thick Mexican bread filled with cooked and seasoned meats and vegetables; chalupas; quesadillas; appetizers in the nature of miniature hand-held burritos, tacos, taquitos, quesadillas, tamales, and flautas; rice; cookies; pastries; coffees; candy; wheat-based snack foods; bungalows in the nature of deep fried tortilla pieces with cinnamon and sugar; flan; pan dulce in the nature of sweet breads; pizza snacks; querno fino in the nature of sweet breads; rosca in the nature of sweet breads; seasonings; cactus seasonings; spices; salsas; sauces; and mole sauce | ACTIVE | May 16, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |