USPTO serial 76273417
PROSPEROUS PET PRODUCTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROSPEROUS PET PRODUCTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn Rzonca
LYNN RZONCA BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL LLP1735 MARKET ST FL 51PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7599UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Feed supplements for pets; medicated grooming preparations for pets, pet shampoo, flea collars for pets, and flea powder for pets | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | cages for pets, litter boxes and litter pans for pets, brushes for pets and horses, pet feeding dishes, and curry combs | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | food for pets and horses; edible pet treats; pet litter; dog biscuits; pet beverages; bird seed | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing technical assistance in connection with the establishment and operation of individual distributorships in the field of pet food and pet supplies; distributorship services in the field of pet food and pet supplies; computerized on-line retail services in the field of pet food and pet supplies; multi-level marketing business services in the field of pet food and pet supplies; retail services by direct solicitation by independent sales representatives in the field of pet food and pet supplies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Preferred Pet Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Preferred Pet Products, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named PROSPEROUS PET PRODUCTS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |