USPTO serial 76273437
WHEN A COOKIE'S NOT ENOUGH, AND A CANDYIS TOO MUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHEN A COOKIE'S NOT ENOUGH, AND A CANDYIS TOO MUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie K. Mitchell
LESLIE K MITCHELL FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Foods and ingredients of foods, namely, potato chips, candied fruit, candied nuts, candied fruit snacks, processed nuts, and yogurt | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Foods and ingredients of foods, namely, snack cakes, cupcakes, tarts, corn chips, grain-based chips, taco chips, tortilla chips, breakfast cereal, frozen confections, cereal-based energy bars, grain-based energy bars, bakery goods, mixes for making bakery goods, edible cake decorations, cake mixes, cakes, pies, candy, candy cake decorations, candy coated popcorn, caramel popcorn, caramels, cereal-based snack food, chocolate, chocolate chips, chocolate covered nuts, chocolate powder, chocolate syrup, chocolate topping, chocolate truffles, chocolate-based fillings for cakes and pies, cocoa, cocoa mixes; cones for ice cream, confectionery chips for baking, cookies, crackers, custard-based fillings for cakes and pies, frozen custards, Danish pastries, dessert souffles, donuts, dumplings, eclairs, flavoring syrup, food flavorings using non-essential oils, chocolate fondue, food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ready-to-eat cereal derived food bars, frosting mixes, frostings, frozen yogurt, fruit pies, flavored and sweetened gelatins, gingerbread, glazed popcorn, granola, granola-based snack bars, hot chocolate, ice cream, ice cream substitute, soy-based ice cream substitute, ice milk, flavored ices, icing, icing mixes, marshmallow topping, milkshakes, bases for making milkshakes, candy mints, molasses, muffins, parfaits, pastries, peanut butter confectionery chips, pies, popped popcorn, processed popcorn, pretzels, puddings, puffed corn snacks, sherbet, granola-based snack bars, rice-based snack foods, wheat-based snack foods, sorbet, topping syrup, tapioca, wafers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mars, Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by Mars, Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named WHEN A COOKIE'S NOT ENOUGH, AND A CANDYIS TOO MUCH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |