Drawing for TWO TERRIFIC TASTES - ONE GREAT SNACK!

USPTO serial 76273442

TWO TERRIFIC TASTES - ONE GREAT SNACK!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3021300Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 29, 2005
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with TWO TERRIFIC TASTES - ONE GREAT SNACK!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cristina A. Carvalho

Cristina A. Carvalho Arent Fox LLP1050 Connecticut Avenue, NWTM DocketWashington, DC 20036-5339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030COOKIESSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
May 24, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 24, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 11, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Sep 16, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 2, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 2, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 21, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 19, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 21, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 4, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 4, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 4, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 26, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 31, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance