Drawing for CAVIUM

USPTO serial 76273475

CAVIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CAVIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexandra J. Horne

ABRAR A HUSSAIN THE SAFINA GROUP LLP650 CASTRO ST STE 210MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009semiconductors, semiconductor chip sets, microprocessors, customized microprocessors, chips for use in computer and network security applications, semiconductor chips and boards for use in servers, switches and routers for network and computer securityABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 11, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 11, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 11, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance