USPTO serial 76273529
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Las Vegas, NV
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Parker A. Bagley
PARKER A BAGLEY MILBANK TWEED1 CHASE MANHATTAN PLZ FL 47NEW YORK, NY 10005-1413UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Rubber balls; action figures and accessories therefore; action skill games; bean bag dolls; plush toys; balloons; golf balls; tennis balls; bath toys; Christmas tree ornaments; board games; building blocks; equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; dolls and doll clothing; doll playsets; children's play cosmetics; crib toys; electric action toys; manipulative games; golf gloves; golf ball markers; jigsaw puzzles; kites; mobiles; music box toys; party favors in the nature of small toys; inflatable pool toys; multiple activity toys; wind-up toys; target games; disc-type toss toys; bows and arrows; toy vehicles; toy cars; toy trucks; toy bucket and shovel sets; roller skates; toy model hobbycraft kits; toy rockets; toy guns; toy holsters; musical toys; badminton sets; bubble making wands and solution sets; toy figurines; toy banks; puppets; yo-yos; skateboards; scooters; face masks; hand-held electronic games | ACTIVE | May 1, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |