USPTO serial 76273530
IF IT'S NOT IN THE OCTAGON, IT'S NOT REAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IF IT'S NOT IN THE OCTAGON, IT'S NOT REAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK C. SCARSI
Mark C. Scarsi Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP601 South Figueroa Street, 30th FloorLos Angeles, CA 90017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded audio cassettes; phonograph records; compact discs; pre-recorded video cassettes; laser video discs; CD-ROM discs; all featuring mixed martial arts competitions, events and programs; computer game programs; motion picture films in the field of mixed martial arts; eyeglasses; sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing and wearing apparel, namely, warm-up suits, sweatshirts, sweatpants; polo shirts; golf shirts; sports shirts; tank tops; vests; pants for babies; baby booties; belts; neckties; suspenders; bandanas; beach sandals; infant and toddler sleepwear; robes; nightshirts and night gowns; pajamas and loungewear; bathing suits; beach wear; diaper sets; toddler short sets; jogging suits; rompers; boys short sets; socks; playsuits; coveralls; wristbands; union suits; henley suits; shorts; skirts; blouses; pants; slacks; shirts; jackets; referees and umpires uniforms; athletic uniforms; team uniform reproductions; sweaters; parkas; turtlenecks; mittens and gloves; underwear; jerseys; bowties; headwear and scarves; ear muffs; earbands and headbands; hosiery; rainwear, namely rain ponchos and jackets; footwear, namely shoes, boots and slippers; bath thongs; nylon shells; hats; caps; visors; aprons; cloth and ski bibs; canvas footwear; knickers; wind resistant jackets; masquerade costumes; blazers; legwarmers; jeans; leotards; workout and sports apparel, namely shorts, jackets, slacks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 24, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |