USPTO serial 76273893
ARMORDOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, JOHN D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARMORDOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Silent Witness Enterprises Ltd.
Surrey, British Columbia V3S 4G5, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica Stone Levy
JESSICA STONE LEVY PRESTON GATES & ELLIS LLP701 5TH AVE STE 5000SEATTLE, WA 98104-7078UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | security monitoring and surveillance systems for use inside and outside of residential and commercial premises comprised of video cameras, decoy video cameras, video camera housing assemblies, decoy video camera housing assemblies, video tape recorders, video monitors and parts and accessories therefor, namely, wiring harnesses, mounting hardware and camera carrying bags; components for the aforesaid security, monitoring and surveillance systems, namely, video cameras, decoy video cameras, video camera housing assemblies, decoy video camera housing assemblies, video tape recorders, video monitors and parts and accessories therefor, namely, wiring harnesses, mounting hardware, and camera carrying bags | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |