USPTO serial 76273946
THE BRONX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE BRONX CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH R. MARCUS
JOSEPH R MARCUS WELSH & KATZ, LTD120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ FL 22CHICAGO, IL 60606-3913UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | PROVIDING NURSING AND GENERAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES INCLUDING IN-PATIENT AND OUT-PATIENT MEDICAL SERVICES AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSISTANCE; MEDICAL AND SURGICAL HOSPITAL SERVICES; SKILLED NURSING FACILITIES; COMPREHENSIVE AND SURGICAL HOSPITAL SERVICES; COMPREHENSIVE CHILDCARE SERVICES NAMELY, NURSING AND HEALTHCARE AND MEDICAL SERVICES, HOME HEALTH CARE SERVICE, REHABILITATION OF DRUG ADDICTED PATIENT; PHYSICAL THERAPY SERVICES, PHARMACEUTICAL ADVICE SERVICES; MEDICAL, CHEMICAL DENTAL, AND OPTICAL LABORATORIES; MEDICAL SERVICES AND CLINICAL RESEARCH SERVICES; DIALYSIS SERVICES AND PRIMARY CARE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SATELLITE CELLS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 9, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |