USPTO serial 76274327
YOGI BAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARTY, GEORGIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOGI BAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey R. Halpern
SUNIL KHEMANEY WAI LAN YOGA TRUSTPO BOX 6164MALIBU, CA 90264UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | SNACK FOODS, NAMELY, CEREAL-BASED FOOD BARS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |