USPTO serial 76274339
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Delegacion Miguel Hidalgo C.P. 11000, MX
Delegacion Miguel Hidalgo C.P. 11000, MX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kristina M. Foudray
KRISTINA M FOUDRAY MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned goods, namely vegetables; mushrooms; meat; seafood; soup; jalapeno chilies; diced nopalitos, cactus leaves in oil, and in natural form; refried beans; and Anaheim chile; fruit jelly; marmalade; edible oils; tomato paste, guava paste, quince paste, and scalded peppers | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Canned goods, namely, meatless sauces, salsa casera, chopped chile and tomato sauce; mole paste; mole in seasoning; green mole; green chile sauce, pass through a mill; liquid green chile sauce; liquid red chile sauce; tamale; enchiladas, tortillas; candy; condiments namely, mustard, catsup, chili sauce, mayonnaise; flavored sweetened gelatin desserts; spices; breakfast cereals; flour; coffee; tea and cocoa | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Fruit juices; concentrates, syrups or powders used in the preparation of non-alcoholic beverages namely fruit drinks, soft drinks, fruit juices, vegetable juice, and nectar | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |