USPTO serial 76274604
2ND SIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with 2ND SIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Ducatman
ROBERT P DUCATMAN JONES DAY REAVIS & POGUEN POINT901 LAKESIDE AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Interactive optoelectric visor and/or spectacles, for use as an optical interface for computer systems in 2-D and 3-D, and for mobile telecommunication and data communication; an eye-mouse for a computer system in 2-D and 3-D, for CAD systems; helmet and head-worn displays for the fields of telemedicine, surgery and for operating remote-controlled land, air and water vehicles and apparatus, and for an automobile pilot assistant system for vision enhancement in fog, glare reduction, supporting color vision at night and during dusk, distance control and as a braking aid, curve warning system, backup aid and nod-off alarm system, and for infotainment and superimposition of supplementary information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for data processing; scientific and industrial research; technical consultation in the field of optics and telecommunications; development and exploitation of industry property rights, and licensing of intellectual property in the computer industry and licenses to industrial property rights and to know how | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |