USPTO serial 76274607
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
NEW YORK, NY
Editions De Parfum Frederic Malle
75007 Paris, FR
Editions De Parfum Frederic Malle
75007 Paris, FR
PARIS, FR
EDITIONS DE PARFUMS FREDERIC MALLE
75001 PARIS, FR
Other trademarks owned by EDITIONS DE PARFUMS FREDERIC MALLE
L-1247 LUXEMBOURG, LU
LUXEMBOURG, LU
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica Heiss
Jessica Heiss The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.110 E. 59th St., 11th FloorTrademark DepartmentNew York, NY 10022| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERFUMERY PRODUCTS, namely, PERFUME, [COLOGNE, TOILET WATER, PERFUME WATER, PERFUME EXTRACT; COSMETIC PRODUCTS AND CLEANING PREPARATIONS FOR THE SKIN, namely, SOAP, [EYE SHADOW IN CREAM AND IN POWDER, LIPSTICK, EYE LINER, LIP GLOSS, HAIR LOTION, PERFUMED SOAP, LOTION FOR FACE AND BODY CARE, BODY CREAM,] BODY MILK, [PERFUMED NON-MEDICINAL CREAMS FOR THE SKIN AND FOR THE FACE, SKIN LOTIONS, BATH OIL, NON-MEDICATED BATH SALT, BATH GEL, BATH SHOWER GEL, BUBBLE BATH, BATH POWDER, BATH TABLETS, FACE AND BODY POWDERS, CHEEK ROUGES, LIP PENCILS, NAIL POLISHES, HAIR SHAMPOOS, HAIR SPRAYS, HAIR CONDITIONERS, SKIN CLEANSING CREAM, BODY DEODORANTS, PERSONAL DEODORANT STICKS, PERSONAL DEODORANT SPRAY, ARTIFICIAL EYELASHES; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; BODY SPRAY TO BE CARRIED IN A PURSE, BODY SPRAY, AFTER SHAVE,] SCENTED SOAP, TALCUM POWDER, DUSTING POWDER, SCENTED CANDLES, BURNING INCENSE, ROOM SPRAY, ROOM FRAGRANCES, DENTIFRICES] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 1, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 1, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 21, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 28, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 13, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 15, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 13, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |