USPTO serial 76274645
PERFEKTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 15, 2005
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERFEKTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG
D-56579 Rengsdorf, DE
Other trademarks owned by Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG
Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG
D-56579 Rengsdorf, DE
Other trademarks owned by Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG
Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG
D-56579 Rengsdorf, DE
Other trademarks owned by Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KLAUS P. STOFFEL
KLAUS P. STOFFEL Lucas & Mercanti LLP30 BROAD STREET, 21st FLOORNew York, NY 10004UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks owned by Lohmann & Rauscher International GmbH & Co. KG
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named PERFEKTA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 31, 2011 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |