USPTO serial 76274690
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HIARVEY B. JACOBSON, JR.
HIARVEY B JACOBSON JR JACOBSONTHE JENIFER BLDG400 7TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2218| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ON-LINE RETAIL STORES FEATURING TRAVEL PRODUCTS, NAMELY APPAREL, BOOKS, BROCHURES, TRAVEL VIDEOS/AUDIOS, AND MAPS, TRAVEL ELECTRICAL ACCESSORIES, FOOD, GEAR AND LUGGAGE, SPORTING EQUIPMENT, GIFTS, HEALTH AND BEAUTY PRODUCTS, TRAVEL PRODUCTS FOR PETS, PHOTOGRAPHIC AND VIDEO EQUIPMENT AND ACCESSORIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | ARRANGING TRAVEL PACKAGES ON-LINE; ON-LINE TRAVEL AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY MAKING RESERVATIONS AND BOOKINGS FOR TRAVEL PACKAGES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF TRAVEL, AND LOCAL AND TOURIST ATTRACTIONS, VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |