USPTO serial 76274779
HOLD'EM CHALLENGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2716700Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 13, 2003
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HOLD'EM CHALLENGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Entertainment [ and educational ] games, namely, gaming and gambling machines, slot machines [; video game software for use in gambling and gaming machines; video display gaming machines for use in connection with video software ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 17, 2001 |
| 028 | [ Entertainment games, namely, casino gaming tables and layout cloths sold as a unit for playing casino card games; casino card games and instructions sold in connection therewith; stand alone video game machines; coin operated video games machines; handheld unit for playing electronic games ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 3, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2009 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| May 16, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 7, 2009 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |