USPTO serial 76275016
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Las Vegas, NV
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEON FINGERGUT
THE DIAMONDS OF RUSSIA LTD THE DIAMONDS OF RUSSIA LTD848 N LAS VEGAS BLVD STE 1052LAS VEGAS, NV 89107UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Goods made wholly or significantly in part of diamonds from Russia and precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, specifically, jewelry, precious gemstones, rings, bracelets, earrings, necklaces, pendants, cuff links, horological and chronological instruments, namely, clocks, watches, and chronometers, and ashtrays and powder compacts made of precious metals | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Apr 1, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2007 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |