Drawing for KRISTALL THE DIAMONDS OF RUSSIA.

USPTO serial 76275016

KRISTALL THE DIAMONDS OF RUSSIA.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2920296Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 25, 2005
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KRISTALL THE DIAMONDS OF RUSSIA.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LEON FINGERGUT

THE DIAMONDS OF RUSSIA LTD THE DIAMONDS OF RUSSIA LTD848 N LAS VEGAS BLVD STE 1052LAS VEGAS, NV 89107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Goods made wholly or significantly in part of diamonds from Russia and precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, specifically, jewelry, precious gemstones, rings, bracelets, earrings, necklaces, pendants, cuff links, horological and chronological instruments, namely, clocks, watches, and chronometers, and ashtrays and powder compacts made of precious metalsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDApr 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2007NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Apr 27, 2007C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Apr 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2007C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Mar 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 13, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 2, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 13, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 3, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 30, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance