USPTO serial 76275111
SMART PAINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3570943Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 10, 2009
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMART PAINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Vancouver, British Columbia V5X 4C6, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEANNA SHANNON
DEANNA SHANNON NEXUS LAW GROUP LLP625 HOWE STREETSUITE 1140VANCOUVER, BC, V6C2T6Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Insulating interior acrylic paints | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KHI CAPITAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KRYTON HOLDINGS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KHI CAPITAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KHI CAPITAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named SMART PAINT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 15, 2018 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2018 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 27, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | WDRL | OTQR WITHDRAWAL FROM PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 24, 2015 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 5, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |