USPTO serial 76275144
EPISTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOLINOFF, JEFFREY S.
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPISTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meyer A. Gross
MEYER A GROSS SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MASISON AVE19TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY TELEVISION AND RADIO BROADCASTING; CABLE TELEVISION BROADCASTING, SATELLITE TELEVISION BROADCASTING; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA, MESSAGES AND IMAGES VIA COMPUTERS, GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, CABLE, TELEPHONE, FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION AND TELEPRINTING; TELESCRIPTION SERVICES, TELEPRINTING; TELETEXT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PRODUCTION OF RADIO AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS; PRODUCTION OF SPORTING EVENTS, ENTERTAINMENT EVENTS AND CULTURAL ACTIVITIES IN THE FIELD OF LIVE MUSICAL GROUP, TELEVISION COMEDY SERIES, MUSICAL VARIETY SERIES, AND SERIOUS DRAMA; PRODUCTION OF LIVE CONCERTS AND MUSIC SHOWS; PARTY PLANNING; PRODUCTION, DISTRIBUTION, AND RENTAL OF MOTION PICTURE FILMS; TV COMMERCIALS AND MOVIE TRAILORS; AUDIO RECORDING AND PRODUCTION; SOUND RECORDING STUDIOS; BOOKING AGENCIES, NAMELY, FOR CONCERTS, SPORTING EVENTS, THEATRICAL SHOWS, AND EXHIBITIONS; MOVIE STUDIOS; DISCOTHEQUES; PUBLICATION OF BOOKS, MAGAZINES, NEWSPAPERS AND PERIODICALS IN THE FIELD OF CULTURE, MUSIC, SPORT, COMMUNICATIONS AND LIBRARIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |