Drawing for XANTHUS

USPTO serial 76275239

XANTHUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XANTHUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Bevilacqua, Esquire

MICHAEL J BEVILACQUA ESQ WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LL60 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Medical test kits consisting primarily of human diagnostic assays for use in determining the suitability of treatments; and pharmaceuticals for use in the treatment of neurological disorders, psychiatric illnesses, tuberculosis, malaria, epilepsy, autoimmune disease, HIV/AIDS, obesity, diabetes, viruses, allergies, transplant patients, gasteroenterological disorders, sexual dysfunction, pain, infection, and depression, and for use in anesthesiaACTIVE—
042Providing medical diagnostic services, analysis of patient populations, analysis of drug study data, development of drugs for others; and providing databases in the field of medicineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 28, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 25, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 3, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 24, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 24, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 24, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 4, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 5, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance