USPTO serial 76275363
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John L. Haller
JOHN L HALLER BROWN, MARTIN, HALLER & MCCLAIN, LLP1660 UNION STSAN DIEGO, CA 92101-2926UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics and Cleaning Preparations; namely skin, hair, facial, and body lotions; sunburn lotion | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceuticals; namely appetite suppressants, cholesterol reducers, diet capsules, diet pills, diet drinks for use as a meal replacement, dietary food supplements, dietary supplements, meal replacements and dietary supplement drink mixes, meal replacement powders, nutritional drink mixes for use as meal replacements, nutritional supplements, and herbal dietary supplements; dairy based meal replacement bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing; namely baseball caps, jackets, neckties, polo shirts, scarves, and T-shirts | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys and Sporting Goods; namely exercise machines and weights | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Meats and Processed Foods; namely flavored whey based food beverages; soy based food beverages used as a milk substitute; dairy based chocolate food beverages; dairy based foods, namely beverages and snack bars ; chips, namely banana chips, fruit chips, and potato chips; chocolate milk; dairy products, namely ice cream, ice milk, and frozen yogurt; milk; protein for use as a food additive; protein for use as a food filler; snack foods, namely bars and chips consisting of whey protein product; snack food dips; whey | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Staple Foods; namely herbal food beverages; grain based beverages; processed breakfast cereals; candy; cereal-based snack food; cereal derived food bars consisting of whey protein; chewing gum; chips, namely corn chips, tortilla chips, and grain based chips; cookies; crackers; food bars; herb teas; honey; oatmeal; rolled oats;pretzels; rice based snack foods; sauces; spices; wafers; wheat protein; and yeast | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Light Beverages, namely fruit drinks; fruit juices; fruit nectars; fruit punch; isotonic drinks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising and Business, namely retail store services featuring food and diet and nutrition products | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education and Entertainment Services, namely athletic competitions; Health club services, namely providing instruction and education in the field of physical exercise; conferences in the fields of athletics, health and diet; Education services, namely providing classes, seminars, and one on one training in the fields of athletics, health and diet; exhibitions in the fields of sports related to weightlifting and weight training fitness and diet; and ports tournaments related to weightlifting, fitness and weight training; sports tournaments; fan clubs; physical education services; seminars in the field of athletics and diet; weight lifting competitions; and television production | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Miscellaneous Services, namely counseling in the area of nutrition, diet, medical problems, exercise, and fitness; food preparation; physical fitness consulting; physical rehabilitation; product research; providing health care information; and restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |