Drawing for PRV-K

USPTO serial 76275401

PRV-K

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRV-K?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cory M. Amron

CORY M AMRON VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLP1828 L ST 1 ITH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MINING MACHINES; CONSTRUCTIONS MACHINES; CARGO HANDLING MACHINES; MOTIVE POWER MACHINES, EXCLUDING THOSE FOR LAND VEHICLES, WATER WHEELS AND WINDMILLS; PNEUMATIC AND HYDRAULIC MACHINES; STARTERS; ALTERNATING CURRENT MOTORS AND DIRECT CURRENT MOTORS, EXCLUDING ALTERNATING CURRENT MOTORS AND DIRECT CURRENT MOTORS FOR LAND VEHICLES; ALTERNATING CURRENT GENERATORS; DIRECT CURRENT GENERATORSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jun 14, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance