USPTO serial 76275591
FORESIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORESIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Colorado Springs, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirstin L. Stoll-DeBell
KIRSTIN L STOLL-DEBELL MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for use by and only offered to financial service institutions, subject to a substantial license fee in the range of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) to three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000.00) or more, able to perform enterprise-wide point-of-sale management for a large variety of investment products | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |