USPTO serial 76275665
RODOLPHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2938506Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2005
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RODOLPHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
La Chaux-de-Fonds, CH
La Chaux-de-Fonds, CH
La Chaux-de-Fonds, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary D. Krugman, Shahrzad Poormosleh
Gary D. Krugman, Shahrzad Poormosleh SUGHRUE MION, PLLC2100 Pennyslvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | [ jewelry; precious stones, namely, emeralds, diamonds, sapphires, rubies; ] horological and chronometric instruments, namely, watches, chronographs for use as watches, chronometers, pocket watches, alarm clocks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 14, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 11, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 11, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |