USPTO serial 76275669
DAI PAI DONG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3008127Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 25, 2005
- Examiner
- DEJESUS, YSA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DAI PAI DONG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI
CHRISTOPHER H. KOZLOWSKI KOZLOWSKI & COMPANY5065 FOREST HILL DRIVEMISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, L5M 5A7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurants, namely, the operation of restaurants and providing of food and beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MOCAROMA (CANADA) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MOCAROMA (CANADA) LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MOCAROMA (CANADA) LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DAI PAI DONG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 25, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |