Drawing for TH

USPTO serial 76275674

TH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laura J. Zeman

LAURA J ZEMAN SNELL & WILMER LLPONE AZ CTR400 E VAN BUREN STPHOENIX, AZ 85004-2202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041EDUCATION COURSES IN THE FIELD AND NUTRITION, AND EDUCATIONAL LITERATURE DISTRIBUTED THEREWITHACTIVE—
042PLANNING, EXECUTING AND SUPERVISING DIET PROGRAMS BY MEANS OF GROUP MEETINGS AND INDIVIDUAL CONSULTATIONSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 5, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 5, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 2, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 2, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 10, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 16, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 17, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 13, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 6, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance