USPTO serial 76275690
PAXL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2828954Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 6, 2004
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PAXL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1040 Brussels, BE
1040 Brussels, BE
1040 Brussels, BE
92800 PUTEAUX, FR
92800 PUTEAUX, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Fredbeck
ANDREW N FREDBECK FROSS ZELNICK LEHRRAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for use in the petrochemicals industry, namely, chemicals for use in the manufacture of resins, rubber, asphalt, paving materials, and roofing materials; plastic molding compounds for use in the manufacture for plastic sheets and films; unprocessed artificial resins, namely, polymeric resins for use in a wide variety of fields; catalysts for use in the manufacture of rubber, chemical additives in the form of main mixtures for the modification of bituminous binding substances | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | Asphalt, pitch; bitumen asphalt, tar based concrete and asphalt patching compound, tar based driveway sealants tar based roofing sealants; bituminous and tar based binding and sealant preparations for use in construction and maintenance of buildings, bituminous and tar based sealants for surfacing and maintaining roads | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PETROFINA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PETROFINA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PETROFINA S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by TOTAL FRANCE
- Other trademarks owned by TOTAL RAFFINAGE MARKETING
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named PAXL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 21, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |