USPTO serial 76275874
CHECK ON HOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2772730Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 7, 2003
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHECK ON HOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Daytona Beach, FL
Daytona Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward M. Livingston,
Check on Hold, Inc.879 Mason Ave.Daytona Beach, FL 32117UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | CHECK CASHING AND DEFERRED DEPOSIT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2014 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Jun 18, 2013 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 14, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 22, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 13, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |