USPTO serial 76275979
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CH-8098 Zurich, CH
CH-8098 Zurich, CH
CH-8098 Zurich, CH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leslie Gladstone Restaino
Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP2300 N St., N.W.Washington, DC 20037UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Prerecorded magnetic and optical data carriers featuring data and information relating to banking, insurance and financial services; computer software and wireless platforms in the field of the financial services industry to enable communications between buyers and sellers, to view and analyze financial information, and to place amend, and track orders of securities over a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | Advertising services, namely, preparing and placing advertisements via electronic and conventional media, such as mail, television, radio, newspapers and periodicals; clerical services; commissioning of publicity and advertising orders for others; bookkeeping; accounting services; business and account auditing; and tax services, namely, tax preparation and consultation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Legal services for others relating to the founding and administration of companies; development of computer data processing programs for others; and intellectual property consultation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |