Drawing for STARPOOL

USPTO serial 76275991

STARPOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAN, DAWN L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STARPOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin G. Raskin

AMY F DIVINO WOLF, BLOCK, SCHORR & SOLIS-COHEN LLP250 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10177UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007water filtering machines for swimming pools and baths; swimming pool cleaning machines and pumps; electric motors for machines to create water turbulence in swimming pools and bathsACTIVE—
011water filtering and purifying devices, water heaters, and filters for swimming pools and bathtubs; water conduit apparatus and sanitary installations, namely, plumbing valves and mixing valves, manually controlled faucets for water supply and water drainage for swimming pools and bathtubs; shower cubicles, outdoor showers for patios and gardens; whirlpool bath installations, namely, whirlpool jet hydrotherapy systems comprised of jets, jet nozzles, water pumps, skimmers, and air flow controls and inlets; hot water heaters for swimming pools and baths; water regulating equipment for swimming pools and baths, namely, water regulating valves; water filtering and purifying devices, water heaters, and filters for swimming poolsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 14, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 16, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 8, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 14, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance