CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for OKI OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

USPTO serial 76276013

OKI OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2790201Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 9, 2003
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with OKI OHIO KENTUCKY INDIANA REGIONAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tracey A. Puthoff

Tracey A. Puthoff TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP425 Walnut StreetSuite 1800CINCINNATI, OH 45202-3957

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Urban planning in the nature of providing research and planning services as delegated by its member governments, to facilitate collaboration between those member governments to improve the quality of life and economic development potential of the region at the intersection of the states of Ohio, Kentucky and IndianaACTIVEApr 30, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 15, 2024NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2024RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Apr 15, 202489AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Apr 15, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 6, 2023E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2022REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2013NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2013RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 6, 201389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Dec 6, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 18, 201389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Nov 18, 2013E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2009C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 16, 2009APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 7, 2009E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 9, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 16, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 21, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 23, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 3, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 21, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance