USPTO serial 76276037
HUMAN ARCHITECTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2916568Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 4, 2005
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HUMAN ARCHITECTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CLINTON TOWNSHIP, MI
CLINTON TOWNSHIP, MI
CLINTON TOWNSHIP, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew A. Newboles
MATTHEW A NEWBOLES STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE, STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management and business efficiency consultation services, namely, enhancing business management, improving worker productivity and increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of manufacturing techniques | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |