USPTO serial 76276087
RED RAYNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3098439Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 30, 2006
- Examiner
- KAZAZIAN, MICHAEL H
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RED RAYNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED AUDIO TAPES, VIDEO TAPES, CD ROMS AND DVDS, FEATURING COMEDY, DRAMA, AND MUSIC | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jan 23, 2006 |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF LIVE MUSICAL PERFORMANCE, LIVE COMEDY AND DRAMA; A SERIES OF SPECIAL SHOWS IN THE FIELD OF COMEDY, DRAMA AND MUSIC, DISTRIBUTED OVER TELEVISION, SATELLITE, AUDIO AND VIDEO MEDIA, CABLE, RADIO, OR VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jan 23, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2009 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2006 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 17, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |