USPTO serial 76276166
PACIFIC FUNDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PACIFIC FUNDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey R. Halpern
Stacey R. Halpern Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear LLP2040 Main Street14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely life insurance and annuities underwriting; mutual fund management services, mutual fund investment, advisory, distribution, brokerage and administration services; mutual fund investment consultation services, investment of funds for others; investment consultation, management, brokerage, and advisory services; investment advice | ABANDONED | Aug 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 2008 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Jun 9, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 17, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2003 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 1, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |